Look what we have here, ladies & gentleman! After a month and a half waiting for the continuation of the Digital vs. Physical series, the Books post is here!
_________________________________________________________________________________
For those that are unaware of this "series", check out the Prologue post. I update it after each subsequent post, with links to every segment. For this post we'll take a look at what physical and digital versions of books have over each other, and how the digital era has impacted both forms of media.
Books have been around for hundreds of years, and they've evolved through the decades. In the beginning books were written by hand. Typically only one copy would ever exist of any given book. This makes since, given how long it could take to re-write a book, especially if it had hand drawn images. Not to mention the fact that the first books were also very difficult to "check out" or borrow. This was because books were originally walls. Dating way back to the early caveman's paintings. Later on during the Egyptian era, carvings were still a primary medium.
However, tablets became an option.
Later on we moved to scrolls and parchments.
Finally, we entered the era of bound books. These could store infinitely more information than tablets and scrolls. The first iteration of books were called a Codex.
Once we reached the point of the printing press by Johannes Gutenberg (around 1440), stone and "codices" became a thing of the past. In the 1800 and 1900 printing vastly improved, especially in the late 1900's, when computers begin to contribute to the process.
Alright, now that the history "lesson" (yes, it was short and doesn't really give too much details), lets look at how physical books stack up to digital books (read as: eBooks). Throughout my 23 years on this earth, I have gone to book stores more times than I can count. Honestly, I love going to book stores. You find so many new authors and sometimes even sub-genres that you never knew existed (I'm going to be posting a video of my recent Barnes & Nobel trip to YouTube sometime soon, hopefully this coming week). Sure, you can find them through random searches, and Amazon's recommendations, but the feeling of walking through a large Brick and Mortar store, full of "knowledge" (obviously it's not all pure knowledge, especially the vampire and romance sections... can we boycott these genres already?). Books come in so many shapes and sizes! From full size, to large print, pocket sized language books to the JUMBO Atlas. Barnes and Noble is great for new books, but I also love going to used book stores. Something you'll never find in an eBook is a first edition of classic books like the Hobbit, in worn condition. Why did I add the last bit in (worn)? Because wear and tare is the truest indicator of a good book. Books frequently go down in price, and used books definitely tend to cost less than a brand new copy.
However, books aren't perfect. Traveling can make reading difficult if you have limited space. It's difficult, and VERY expensive to bring a large collection of books on a flight. Similarly, traveling with course/school books is unpleasant. In college I had several books that were easily 1000 pages. Lugging them to and from class everyday was anything but fun.
Enter eBooks and Audio books. To be honest, I've traveled quite a bit in the last 2 years. Flying for work and interviews, as well as vacationing. On my nook I have a decent little library of my favorite books, as well as many others I would like to read, and quite a few CS related books for work and side-projects. On my phone I have a decent little collection of audio books from Audible. In two devices weighing maybe two pounds, tops, I have more digital books than I do physical books, and yet I can take that little library of mine anywhere. This is by far the greatest benefit of digital books; portability. Not only can you have a library in your pocket, but you can also have that same library on your computer(s), tablet, and in the cloud. I'll also note that it's nice not having to worry about bookmarks falling out, or dropping the book and losing your place.
While you really can't sell back eBooks and Audio books (which is a benefit of physical books, especially for college students... those books are WAY too expensive!), they are frequently cheaper. Unfortunately, DRM's (Digital Rights Management) are embedded into most eBooks and audio books, which can make it difficult to use them on all of your preferred devices. For example, Amazons Kindle eBooks requires either a Kindle or the Kindle eReader app in order to read the books you purchased. Audio books purchased from Amazon (actually, through Audible) require the Audible app to listen to the audio books you purchased. Whereas physically books just require your eyes (or hands if you're reading braille), and a means of turning the pages. DRM's are frequently subjects of heated debate, but I'll save that topic for another day.
Honestly, I have found that I use both eBooks and physical books. If I really enjoy a eBook, you can bet that I'll be picking up a physical copy! Frequently I hear people say that books are dying, and that everyone is moving to eBooks and Audio books. But to be honest, I don't think this will happen any time soon. After all, authors and readers love Book Signing events.
Me Myself and I
This is the blog of Orion, which coincidentally is me. This is just a place where I will post all sorts of thoughts, idea's, opinions, questions, reviews (of technology, software and games), as well as the occasional rant or rave about things in my life. You're free to take a look and respond to anything that strikes your interest. :)
Sunday, July 6, 2014
Friday, June 27, 2014
The end is near...!
Or rather, the end is here. Okay, I realize that probably makes me sound crazy. So please allow me to clarify, the end of my month long (give or take a week) hiatus is over. For those that aren't aware, we recently moved. Not down the street from our apartment. No, not a city over, or closer to my work. We move out of state... and way over on the other side of the country! We took a 6 day road trip from West Bloomfield, MI to San Jose, CA. And boy, let me tell you, San Jose, Palo Alto (where I work now), and heck California as a whole just blows Michigan out of the universe. We love it here! That is honestly putting it mildly. We've lived in 4 states now (UT, PA, MI, and now CA), and visited (for at least one day) 9 states (WA, VI, DC, OH, NE, WY, IN, IL, IA) within the last year (give or take a few weeks). From the moment we arrived in CA and started interacting with people we realized we had found our home.
Seriously. If you have never been to CA, do it! Now. Like, right now. As in, stop reading this post, book a flight or hop in your car and head to CA. This weekend would actually be an interesting time to visit, as Pride is this weekend, and I hear that the San Francisco Pride Festival is one of, if not the, biggest in the world. Unfortunately, we most likely wont be going this year due to other things that have come up. :/
I have several posts I'm working on (including the next few installments of the "Digital vs Physical" series). As well as a few videos. Here's what to look forward to in the next few posts:
Seriously. If you have never been to CA, do it! Now. Like, right now. As in, stop reading this post, book a flight or hop in your car and head to CA. This weekend would actually be an interesting time to visit, as Pride is this weekend, and I hear that the San Francisco Pride Festival is one of, if not the, biggest in the world. Unfortunately, we most likely wont be going this year due to other things that have come up. :/
I have several posts I'm working on (including the next few installments of the "Digital vs Physical" series). As well as a few videos. Here's what to look forward to in the next few posts:
- Digital vs Physical (Should be wrapped up by the end of July)
- New series: Long-Haul Reviews (these are reviews I'll be posting about products I've "put through their paces" for at least 3 months, as I feel this helps give more accurate depictions of how well things really hold up, such as laptops and TV's)
- Posts about our trip with loads of pictures
- Posts about video's I'll be releasing on YouTube: "Is it worth it?" (Junes LootCrate recently arrived and the video is in the works), videos from the trip, Aldingbrooke apartments review (where we live in MI for 5 months), a quick tour of our new apartment in San Jose, and a few other ideas I'm working on
- Pictures. An INSANE number of pictures from the trip (~1500). I'm trying to dwindle the pile down to the gyms.
- I'm also working on a post (that may become a mini series) about CA!
Thoughts? Ideas? Complaints? Something else? Leave it in the comments! :)
Sunday, May 18, 2014
Are we approaching the end of healthy competition?
This year alone has brought about several headline-acquisitions:
- Facebook purchased WhatsApp for $19 billion
- Google purchased Nest for $3.2 billion
- Lenovo purchased Motorola for $2.91 billion
- Facebook purchased Oculus for $2 billion
- Google purchased DeepMind for $500 million
- Comcast purchased Time Warner for $45 billion
- AT&T purchased DirecTV for $50 billion
*Note: Most of, if not all of these deals, are still under review by various governments globally, before being finalized. Additionally, this is a VERY short list. There have been other rumors, and announced deals this year, globally, that pertain to technology.
Now, there's a new rumor circulating that certainly sounds realistic (and terrifying) YouTube (Google) is about to finalize negotiations to purchase the Game streaming service Twitch. Why would I consider this terrifying? Simple: YouTube (Google) is getting closer and closer to owning all user-submitted video services on the internet. Additionally, rumor has it that Microsoft, and possibly Yahoo were attempting to court the young Twitch service, but were turned down. While it still would have been unfortunate that our options are thinning out, at least it would be someone other than Google offering a video service. This is something we really need (I am glad Yahoo! is releasing their own service).
So why do I bring this up? It's simple: this year in particular has seen a few large fish swallow-up everything they possibly can. In the end it means we the user have two options when choosing certain services. Example: Internet providers, Comcast or T.... erm... make that one option.
Okay, so that's not entirely accurate. The point is, we are losing options. We will soon only have one real option for cable-internet. On the flip-side, AT&T has stated that if the FCC approves their purchase of DirecTV (without placing any regulations or stipulations), they will honor the old Net Neutrality rules for 3 years. Though that's still a crap-shoot.
When Facebook announced the purchase of WhatsApp and Oculus, there was an outcry from users, claiming they would no longer use the services. I heard/read very little positive responses from users towards the acquisitions (though analysts acted positively). Comcasts purchase of Time Warner is largely considered the reason Comcast was voted the worst company in America. People were outraged and concerned about Google purchasing Nest (I was actually close to purchasing one, before Google swooped up the company). Even though the deal has not been officially announced yet, even fans of Google and YouTube are disgruntled about the possible acquisition. We like options. We don't necessarily need a million options, but we want options. Most notably, people that do not use Android or Chrome OS (especially Windows Phone and Xbox users) are typically especially concerned when Google purchases a company that currently (in one way or another) supports their preferred platform. After all, Google has continually showed a desire to stifle competition whenever they can.
I will end this post with a "humorous" note: Microsoft, Facebook, and Google all claim to encourage and foster startup companies. However, as soon as any of them become anything, they try to swoop them up. The future is starting to look like a 10 (random number) company world.
So why do I bring this up? It's simple: this year in particular has seen a few large fish swallow-up everything they possibly can. In the end it means we the user have two options when choosing certain services. Example: Internet providers, Comcast or T.... erm... make that one option.
Okay, so that's not entirely accurate. The point is, we are losing options. We will soon only have one real option for cable-internet. On the flip-side, AT&T has stated that if the FCC approves their purchase of DirecTV (without placing any regulations or stipulations), they will honor the old Net Neutrality rules for 3 years. Though that's still a crap-shoot.
When Facebook announced the purchase of WhatsApp and Oculus, there was an outcry from users, claiming they would no longer use the services. I heard/read very little positive responses from users towards the acquisitions (though analysts acted positively). Comcasts purchase of Time Warner is largely considered the reason Comcast was voted the worst company in America. People were outraged and concerned about Google purchasing Nest (I was actually close to purchasing one, before Google swooped up the company). Even though the deal has not been officially announced yet, even fans of Google and YouTube are disgruntled about the possible acquisition. We like options. We don't necessarily need a million options, but we want options. Most notably, people that do not use Android or Chrome OS (especially Windows Phone and Xbox users) are typically especially concerned when Google purchases a company that currently (in one way or another) supports their preferred platform. After all, Google has continually showed a desire to stifle competition whenever they can.
I will end this post with a "humorous" note: Microsoft, Facebook, and Google all claim to encourage and foster startup companies. However, as soon as any of them become anything, they try to swoop them up. The future is starting to look like a 10 (random number) company world.
The final count-down: MI to CA
We've known since February 4th, that we will be moving to CA this summer. As we have gotten closer to the summer months, my transfer from one of my employers divisions in MI to another division in CA has been finalized. I've begun training for the projects I will be working on/overseeing/taking over once I start at the other office. Our last day in MI is June 6th. After work, we'll hop in the car with our two faithful companions (the kittens Linux & Nibbler), and start our week long adventure! We are quite excited. While we are excited to leave MI, and be in a state neither of us have lived in, I am most excited about working in Silicon Valley. I feel that most engineers in the tech industry would be excited about living and working in one of (if not the) biggest tech hubs in the world.
All of that being said, we're looking for tips and recommendations from those the internet. Please feel free in the comments to respond to any or all of the following:
All of that being said, we're looking for tips and recommendations from those the internet. Please feel free in the comments to respond to any or all of the following:
- What are the best sites to see and places to visit in CA?
- If you were taking a roadtrip and had up-to a week to travel, what route from MI to CA would you take? What sites would you see?
- In general, what recommendations do you have? (This will be our second cross-country roadtrip in the last year).
- What's your stance on tinting windows? Would you/have you done it, and is it worth it?
- If you've traveled long distance with pets, especially cats (ours are about 9 months old), what recommendations do you have?
- We will be taking videos of the trip, as well as TONS of pictures (last time we took around 600, we plan to beat that). What cameras/camcorders do you guys recommend? (We have two Nokia Lumia 920's (which we love!) and are trying to decide if it's worth upgrading to 1020's/1520's or just picking up a camera/camcorder (especially since new devices are on the horizon)).
- Anything else you'd recommend?
Digital vs. Physical: Music
This is Part 3 of my “Digital vs. Physical” series. For those just joining, that have not read the prologue post, this series is about digital and physical media, such as games and music, and TV shows.
To be honest, I personally feel like there is very little to debate about for this topic. Seriously. In many ways I would consider music and audio based media to be trailblazers for digital content. When Napster was released in 1999, it took off relatively quickly, for the time. It allowed users to download MP3 files of their favorite music via P2P network. By January of 2001, it had over 10 million users.
Napster was closed down by a court order in the summer. However, digital music continued in the form of Apples iTunes service. While it was best used with Apple devices, such as iPods, iPads, and iPhones, it still garnered attention (and use) from consumers on every platform. In February of 2013, Apple celebrated 25 billion songs sold. In fact, at the time Apple claimed that over 15,000 songs were being downloaded per minute.
I remember 15 years ago, when CD's were the preferred means of getting your music fix. It was what felt like a million times better than cassettes. Even in high school, August 2005 - June 2009, CD's were the "it" medium for music. Sure, many people had iPhones and iPods, as well as Sony Erickson Walkman, and even a few Zunes, but most of the people I knew still used CD's. In college I noticed the quick transition from CD's to downloaded music. But is purchasing a digital copy really the best solution?
Over the past few years there has been a tremendous push to transition from downloading music and paying per song or album, to streaming. Sure, in some cases we still download the music for offline enjoyment, but we don't expect to pay per song all that much anymore. Here are the 13 most well known streaming services (some, like Xbox Music will allow you to download the music for offline listening).
Catalog | Quality | Platforms | Price | |
Beats Music | 20m | 320 Kbps | Android, iOS, Web, Windows | $10/mo. |
Google Play | 20m | 320 Kbps | Android, iOS, Web | Free or $10/mo. extras |
Grooveshark | Unknown | Unknown | Android, Web | Free w/ads, $6/mo., $9/mo. mobile |
iHeartRadio | 15m | Unknown | Android, BlackBerry, iOS, Web, Windows, Xbox | Free |
iTunes Radio | 26m | 256 Kbps | Apple TV, iOS, OS X, Windows | Free w/ads or $25/yr |
Last.fm | Variable | 128 Kbps | Android, iOS, Linux, OS X, Windows, Sonos, Web | Free or $3/mo. extras |
Sony Music | 25m | 320 Kbps | Android, iOS, PlayStation, Web, TVs | $5/mo. or $10/mo. mobile |
Pandora | 1m | 192 Kbps | Android, BlackBerry, iOS, Roku, Sonos, Web, Xbox | Free w/ads or $5/mo. |
Rhapsody | 32m | 192 Kbps | Android, iOS, Web, Windows, Xbox | $10/mo. |
Rdio | 20m | 192 Kbps | Android, BlackBerry, iOS, OS X, Web, Windows | $5/mo., $10/mo. mobile, $18/mo. family |
Slacker | 13m | 128 Kbps | Android, iOS, Web, Windows, Xbox | Free w/ads, $4/mo., $10/mo. extras |
Spotify | 20m | 320 Kbps | Android, BlackBerry, iOS, OS X, Windows | $10/mo. |
Xbox Music | 30m | 192 Kbps | Android, iOS, Web, Windows, Xbox | $10/mo., $60/yr for Xbox Live to listen on Xbox |
*Table is compliments of Time.com's article "13 Streaming Music Services Compared by Price, Quality, Catalog Size and More".
Chances are, no matter which service you pick, you'll find plenty of your top music picks available. Services like Google Play, Spotify and Xbox Music often times add music right as it becomes available (personally, I have never been unable to find a song I am looking for). Streaming services offer such a wide variety. Even if you only listen to 15 new songs a month, you're going to at least break-even in terms of getting a digital copy or streaming, over purchasing an actual CD.
To add further fuel to the "digital" fire, podcasts really weren't something you could get with cassettes and CD's. iTunes and Xbox Music allow you to download (and at least with Xbox Music, stream) podcasts from multiple devices, without having to pay per podcast episode. This has been one of my personal biggest draws to digital audio media (if you haven't checked out "We're Alive", you really should!).
Okay, sure, there are still a few times you may want to pickup a physical copy of music, such as the Wu-Tang's Secret Album. Or maybe if you have a multi-CD changer, or just plain prefer CD's. But personally, I have found that fewer and fewer people even consider using CD's. It used to be that CD's were a hit on long drives, such as road-trips. But now, it's cellphones and MP3 players. Even if your car doesn't have built in support for playing media from phones and MP3 players, there are cheap workarounds (such as cassettes with an auxiliary cord for your mobile device). This is probably the only point in this series where I will say this: Physical versions of audio based media is all but dead, in the eyes of the average and modern consumers.
Labels:
Digital Content,
Media,
Opinion,
Physical Content,
Technology
Thursday, May 15, 2014
Net Neutrality Ruling
Unfortunately, I have been super busy with work, apartment hunting, and a really bad cold the last two weeks. So it will be a little while (hopefully this weekend) before I post the next part of the Digital vs. Physical series.
For now, here's a like to my video on YouTube about today's ruling from the FCC, in regards to their new "rules" (read as: empowering ISP's stranglehold over the world) today. And I'll try to post more info about it tomorrow.
Here's the links for various info regarding Net Neutrality and the ruling today:
FCC Inbox for Net Neutrality
How to tell the FCC what you think
What is Net Neutrality
Today's FCC Meeting
TV She Creators against the rules (LONG list)
Open Letter from tech companies
Letter from ISP's
USA Today
Protests
6 Things to know about today's ruling
Senators Response
Previous Petition
For now, here's a like to my video on YouTube about today's ruling from the FCC, in regards to their new "rules" (read as: empowering ISP's stranglehold over the world) today. And I'll try to post more info about it tomorrow.
Here's the links for various info regarding Net Neutrality and the ruling today:
With the FCC's announcement today, the real battle for Net
Neutrality, and the future of the internet as we know it, begins.
Please use the Twitter and FCC Inbox links to let them know
what you think!
Previous Petition
Saturday, May 3, 2014
Soapbox: Why I hate apartment hunting in Silicon Valley
We are moving to Silicon Valley in the summer. This may sound exciting at first... but not everything in CA is "sunshine and lollipops". As we will only be in California for 6 months, we are looking for an apartment. The apartment hunting process is typically unpleasant, but rarely takes all that long (in my experience). When we moved to PA, we called 5 apartment complex's before we found one that met our needs. When we moved to MI, we called 11 apartment complex's. Over the last 3 months we have called 127 apartment complex's. We have recalled every single one of them within the last week.
When apartment hunting in UT, PA, or MI, apartments required a 60-day notice, so finding something well in advance of moving wasn't an issue. However, in CA I have yet to find a single apartment that requires longer than 30 days notice. Which means most complex's do not know what they will have available mid-June until mid-May. To make matters worse, very few complex's offer a 6 month lease. Most of the ones that do charge $100 ~ $300 a month more. Several complex's are willing to offer a 6 month lease only if you move in during December/January. I had more than a few leasing agents inform me that they increase the lease terms to 12 months and the cost of rent during the summer, as the market is "so hot" at that time. So essentially, they want to really stick it to the customers. Of course, there are also some complex's that do not offer a lease, but rather you rent month-to-month. The irony of course, is that almost all for them still require a guarantee that you will be leasing for a minimum of 12 months.
It has not been uncommon for us to call an apartment one a week, leave a message, and never get a response. Often times, we find that the leasing agents are very rude, almost as if we are wasting their time. Let me get this straight, I am potentially willing to pay you what is already an insane monthly rent, for a most likely sub-par apartment, and you have the gull to talk down to us or act like we are wasting your time?
There's an old joke about how men are inaccurate about size. But i have found that female leasing agents in CA are worse. In what world is a 400sq/ft 1 bed - 1 bath apartment "huge"? I currently pay $900 a month for a 1000sq/ft apartment, where I actually have my own washer and dryer, instead of sharing a laundry facility. That is huge, and a great rate. $2000+ for a 517sq/ft 1b-1b, without a washer and dryer, is NOT a great deal!
My final complaint, pets... We have two cats. In PA and MI, this didn't make that big of a difference in rent or the security deposit. In CA, we are finding that most complex's really want to milk you for every last penny. Charging a $500 deposit per cat (in one case, $1000 per cat), plus an additional $50 - $100 per month, and one months rent for the base deposit, is pretty much highway robbery. I could understand this if we were looking at high-class apartments. But we are mostly looking at complex's that were built in the '80's, and have not been improved/remodeled since being built. Let me be as blunt and honest as possible: if you charge a monthly fee on-top of a pet deposit, and are not doing anything special for my pets, you are NOT in any way whatsoever a pet-friendly complex. To the two complex's I have found that charge a very minimal pet deposit, and do not charge a monthly pet fee, thank you!
We may have finally found an apartment, which is great.. but this whole process has been stressful and incredibly unpleasant. Regardless, I am ecstatic to leave MI.
When apartment hunting in UT, PA, or MI, apartments required a 60-day notice, so finding something well in advance of moving wasn't an issue. However, in CA I have yet to find a single apartment that requires longer than 30 days notice. Which means most complex's do not know what they will have available mid-June until mid-May. To make matters worse, very few complex's offer a 6 month lease. Most of the ones that do charge $100 ~ $300 a month more. Several complex's are willing to offer a 6 month lease only if you move in during December/January. I had more than a few leasing agents inform me that they increase the lease terms to 12 months and the cost of rent during the summer, as the market is "so hot" at that time. So essentially, they want to really stick it to the customers. Of course, there are also some complex's that do not offer a lease, but rather you rent month-to-month. The irony of course, is that almost all for them still require a guarantee that you will be leasing for a minimum of 12 months.
It has not been uncommon for us to call an apartment one a week, leave a message, and never get a response. Often times, we find that the leasing agents are very rude, almost as if we are wasting their time. Let me get this straight, I am potentially willing to pay you what is already an insane monthly rent, for a most likely sub-par apartment, and you have the gull to talk down to us or act like we are wasting your time?
Dear Leasing Agents,
When you spend 9 hours a day at work, and then spend 4 or 5 hours a night researching and calling one complex after the next, then and ONLY then do you have the slightest bit of right to act like I am wasting your time. The person wasting time, is the leasing agent that decides to list every single feature and aspect about the complex and area before either answering my questions or even allowing me to ask them. Our phone call would only be 5 minutes, tops, if you allowed me to ask all my questions at the start, and dropped the d*mn attitude. Oh, and if your complex is so nice, why the f***k does it lack a website? Seriously, why in this day-and-age would you decide not to have a website? Or at the very least, display info on sites like "ForRent.com".
My final complaint, pets... We have two cats. In PA and MI, this didn't make that big of a difference in rent or the security deposit. In CA, we are finding that most complex's really want to milk you for every last penny. Charging a $500 deposit per cat (in one case, $1000 per cat), plus an additional $50 - $100 per month, and one months rent for the base deposit, is pretty much highway robbery. I could understand this if we were looking at high-class apartments. But we are mostly looking at complex's that were built in the '80's, and have not been improved/remodeled since being built. Let me be as blunt and honest as possible: if you charge a monthly fee on-top of a pet deposit, and are not doing anything special for my pets, you are NOT in any way whatsoever a pet-friendly complex. To the two complex's I have found that charge a very minimal pet deposit, and do not charge a monthly pet fee, thank you!
We may have finally found an apartment, which is great.. but this whole process has been stressful and incredibly unpleasant. Regardless, I am ecstatic to leave MI.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)